Introduction: | The Paradox in a Nutshell |
The calorie paradox for raw vegan foods can be stated succinctly, as follows:
It should be noted that actual calorie requirements will vary by individual according to age, gender, size (weight), level of physical activity, special situations (e.g., growing children, pregnancy and lactation, etc.), and other factors. The figure of 2,000 calories is used as a standard in this paper because it is a relatively conservative minimum for adults in most Western countries. Of course, as requirements vary, individuals who wish to have a more precise estimate of their calorie requirements might want to consult Recommended Dietary Allowances (National Research Council, 1989, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.) for details.
The discussion here of the calorie paradox is inspired by the discussion of the topic in The Natural Hygiene Handbook (1996, American Natural Hygiene Society, pp. 46-47), although they don't use the terminology "paradox." Careful consideration and evaluation of the raw calorie paradox provides valuable insights into raw veganism, and goes a considerable way toward explaining why so very few people succeed or thrive, long term, on 100% raw vegan diets, and also why so many raw vegans are extremely thin/
Back to Frank Talk from Long-Time Insiders
Table of
Contents
Discussion:
PROCEED TO FIRST SECTION OF ARTICLE
(Calories ARE Relevant: A Critique of Herbert Shelton on Calories)