Navigation bar--use text links at bottom of page.

(Looking at the Science on Raw vs. Cooked Foods--continued, Part 2F)


Comparison of vitamin levels in raw vs. cooked foods

We also investigated the USDA nutrient database [USDA Agricultural Research Service 1998] for a few foods that were analyzed both raw and cooked. The figures shown represent the amounts of vitamins per 100 grams of food, which one should keep in mind may differ from what is actually bioavailable. In addition, we should keep in mind that, most of the time, cooking results in a loss of water content in foods, hence an artificial "concentration" of vitamins which masks the loss caused by heat or boiling in water. Thus, in order to make meaningful comparisons, the second table below shows vitamin values correcting for the effect of any lost water content. Even then, some inconsistencies are unavoidable, since different varieties of a food may have differing vitamin contents, and differing samples may have been used.

Finally, not all cooking methods are presented here--lighter cooking methods obviously result in less vitamin losses.

VITAMIN LEVELS IN RAW VS. COOKED FOODS
(uncorrected for water loss)


(Note: Amounts are expressed in units per 100g portion of food.
In the table below, "boiled" = boiled, drained, without salt.)

Food

Water Content (%)

Vitamin Assay

C (mg)

B1 (mg)

B2 (mg)

B3 (mg)

B5 (mg)

Broccoli, raw

91%

93

.065

.12

.64

.53

Broccoli, boiled

91%

75

.055

.11

.57

.51

Beef liver, raw

69%

22

.26

2.8

13

7.6

Beef liver, braised

66%

23

.20

4.1

11

4.6

Beef liver, pan-fried

56%

23

.21

4.1

14

5.9

Carrots, raw

88%

9.3

.097

.059

.93

.20

Carrots, boiled

87%

2.3

.034

.056

.51

.30

Almonds, dried

4%

.6

.21

.78

3.4

.47

Almonds, dry-roasted

3%

.7

.13

.60

2.8

.25

Mung bean sprouts, raw

90%

13

.084

.12

.75

.38

Mung bean sprouts, boiled

94%

11

.050

.10

.82

.24

Tomatoes, red, raw

94%

19

.059

.048

.63

.25

Tomatoes, boiled

92%

23

.07

.057

.75

.30

Mackerel, Atlantic, raw

63%

.4

.18

.31

9.1

.86

Mackerel, cooked, dry heat

53%

.4

.16

.41

6.8

.99

(table, continued)

Food

Water Content (%)

Vitamin Assay

B6 (mg)

Folate (mcg)

B12 (mcg)

A (IU)

E (mg)

Broccoli, raw

91%

.16

71

0

1,500

1.7

Broccoli, boiled

91%

.14

50

0

1,400

1.7

Beef liver, raw

69%

.95

250

69

35,000

.67

Beef liver, braised

66%

.91

220

71

35,000

?

Beef liver, pan-fried

56%

1.4

220

112

36,000

.63

Carrots, raw

88%

.15

14

0

28,000

.46

Carrots, boiled

87%

.25

14

0

24,000

.42

Almonds, dried

4%

.11

59

0

0

24

Almonds, dry-roasted

3%

.07

64

0

0

5.5

Mung bean sprouts, raw

90%

.09

61

0

21

.01

Mung bean sprouts, boiled

94%

.05

29

0

14

.01

Tomatoes, red, raw

94%

.08

15

0

620

.38

Tomatoes, boiled

92%

.09

13

0

740

.38

Mackerel, Atlantic, raw

63%

.40

1.3

8.7

165

1.5

Mackerel, cooked, dry heat

53%

.46

1.5

19

180

?

Here is the average vitamin loss, expressed in percentages, and corrected for the effect of water loss:

VITAMIN LOSSES FROM COOKING
(corrected for water loss)


(Expressed as average percentage decrease from value observed in raw food.)

Food

Water Content

Vitamin Assay

C

B1

B2

B3

B5

Average Losses (% lost compared to Raw value)

Uncorrected for water loss

8

8

18

-11

10

9

Corrected for water loss

--

16

26

-3

18

17

(table, continued)

Food

Water Content

Vitamin Assay

B6

Folate

B12

A

E

Average Losses (% lost compared to Raw value)

Uncorrected for water loss

8

-5

12

?

3

3

Corrected for water loss

--

3

20

?

11

11

Overall vitamin losses due to cooking are relatively modest. While there are a few inconsistencies in the above tables due likely to differing samples, globally we see that, on average, cooking does destroy vitamins, but the consequences are not catastrophic. Average vitamin losses after correction for water loss range from about 10 to 25% in most cases. Also, vitamin losses correlate with what our textbook by Kreutler et al. [1987] said, but not precisely, so obviously heat is only one of the many factors which affect vitamin content.

Table illustrates dietary variety is as significant to nutrition as cooking. Finally, given the extreme variability in vitamin content of different foods, there is a strong case to be made that variety is at least as important as cooking practices: someone eating 95% raw fruit is far more likely to be vitamin-deficient than someone eating a 100% cooked diet, but including a variety of foods like liver, green vegetables, etc.



Cooking's effect on bioavailability

Next, the vitamin value of a food is not only determined by the absolute amount of vitamins it contains, but also by their bioavailability, which also may be influenced by numerous factors including cooking.

GO TO NEXT PART OF ARTICLE

(Effects of Cooking on Mineral Levels Compared to Raw Foods)

Return to beginning of article

SEE REFERENCE LIST


SEE TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR: PART 1 PART 2 PART 3

GO TO PART 1 - Is Cooked Food "Toxic"?

GO TO PART 2 - Does Cooked Food Contain Less Nutrition?

GO TO PART 3 - Discussion: 100% Raw vs. Predominantly Raw

Back to Research-Based Appraisals of Alternative Diet Lore

   Beyond Veg home   |   Feedback   |   Links