Navigation bar--use text links at bottom of page.

(Effects of a Nutrition Education Program on Physicians/Residents--continued)



APPENDIX. E:   SELECTED STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT CONTINGENCY TABLES


Editorial Notes:

The tables below and the tables in chapter 4 were produced using two different tool sets (software). Because of this, the appearance (style) of the tables here is different from those in chapter 4.

For those interested in details, the tables here were prepared using the SAS® System, specifically the Output Display System of the base SAS software product. A standard style sheet provided in SAS was used (with some minor modifications). The tables utilize cascading style sheets and JavaScript. Your browser must support these features in order to display the tables correctly. Also, depending on your browser, the fonts that appear in these appendices may be different from the fonts in the other parts of the thesis.

Check before you start reading the tables:

Readers are advised that this appendix is intended primarily for those who can interpret the results of a basic statistical analysis. If you are unfamiliar with statistics, or uncomfortable with it, we gently suggest that you might not find these appendices to be relevant to you.

Note: SAS® is a registered trademark of SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina [U.S.].

 

Statistical Notes: Help in Interpreting the Tables

This appendix provides results for contingency tables done for the thesis. The output below is labeled, however some readers may find parts of it to be hard to understand. The notes below provide a brief overview of the most important elements in reading the tables (overview only: not intended to be comprehensive).

2-Variable Contingency Tables:

These have a rectangular cell structure, with cells arranged in rows and columns. The rows define one categorical variable and its values, the columns the other categorical variable. The term categorical variable refers to discrete variables, e.g., a survey question that has 2 replies: "yes" or "no." This is to distinguish it from a non-categorical ("continuous") variable with a range of values in interval(s), e.g. a temperature reading that usually falls between 0 and 100 degrees Centigrade.

In the contingency tables, rows and columns are labeled with the identity of the associated variables, which come from the survey done for this thesis. For example, you will see below columns labeled "Pre-test" and Post-test," the two study periods for the survey. Rows in each table are labeled with the value for the requisite variable, say for a specific example "Yes" and "No." Thus the cell that falls in the intersection of column number c, and row number r, gives the statistics for those responses where we have (row, column) = (r,c). For a more demonstrative example, in the Pre-Test column, if we consider a table where the first row is labeled "No," then the statistics in that cell reflect the people in the pre-test survey who answered "No" to the question that defines the rows.

Each of the main cells in the contingency tables list 3 numbers:

  • Frequency = raw number of responses for cell (can be zero if no responses in that cell).

  • Percent = cell count as percentage of table total = (cell frequency)/(table total count).

  • Col Pct = column percentage = (cell frequency)/(total count for column cell is in).

The SAS system can compute additional cell statistics, but we have limited it to the most relevant ones for the tables here. If you look at the last row/last column in each table, you will see row and column subtotals with their percentages, as well as the overall table totals in the lower right corner of each table.

Two of the chi-square statistics are of interest: the one simply labeled "Chi-Square," a better designation for which is the goodness-of-fit chi-square, and the "Likelihood Ratio Chi-Square." These statistics are usually close in value to each other. (They are asymptotically equivalent, which means they converge to the same value as the sample size increases without bound.)

The SAS tables include a number of other versions of chi-square statistics, Fisher's exact test (only for 2X2 tables), and a number of other test statistics. The thesis did not use these other statistics; if you understand them you might find them of interest. Otherwise, you can safely ignore them here if you wish (in the context of interpreting the thesis).

If you still have difficulty understanding these tables, or have questions regarding statistics in the table that are not covered above, please consult an intermediate statistics text, and /or college-level texts on contingency tables [categorical data analysis] for clarification. Please note that Beyond Veg authors/editors cannot provide statistical tutoring via email.



 
Nutrition Education Initiative
Indiana State University, 1996-1997
Main reference variable

The FREQ Procedure

Timing of survey response
Test Frequency Percent Cumulative
Frequency
Cumulative
Percent
Pre-Test 304 49.84 304 49.84
PostTest 306 50.16 610 100.00

 


 
Nutrition Education Initiative
Indiana State University, 1996-1997
Significant results: chapter 4, table 3

The FREQ Procedure

Frequency
Percent
Col Pct
Table of DHMP by Test
DHMP(Q5: Discuss nutrition health maint plan?) Test(Timing of survey response) Total
Pre-Test PostTest
No 252
41.31
82.89
234
38.36
76.47
486
79.67
 
Yes 52
8.52
17.11
72
11.80
23.53
124
20.33
 
Total 304
49.84
306
50.16
610
100.00

Statistics for Table of DHMP by Test

 

Statistic DF Value Prob
Chi-Square 1 3.8860 0.0487
Likelihood Ratio Chi-Square 1 3.9002 0.0483
Continuity Adj. Chi-Square 1 3.4994 0.0614
Mantel-Haenszel Chi-Square 1 3.8796 0.0489
Phi Coefficient   0.0798  
Contingency Coefficient   0.0796  
Cramer's V   0.0798  
 
Fisher's Exact Test
Cell (1,1) Frequency (F) 252
Left-sided Pr <= F 0.9810
Right-sided Pr >= F 0.0305
   
Table Probability (P) 0.0116
Two-sided Pr <= P 0.0559

Sample Size = 610

 

Frequency
Percent
Col Pct
Table of Recom by Test
Recom(Q6 IND: Any Nutrition Recommendations?) Test(Timing of survey response) Total
Pre-Test PostTest
No 280
45.90
92.11
260
42.62
84.97
540
88.52
 
Yes 24
3.93
7.89
46
7.54
15.03
70
11.48
 
Total 304
49.84
306
50.16
610
100.00

Statistics for Table of Recom by Test

 

Statistic DF Value Prob
Chi-Square 1 7.6486 0.0057
Likelihood Ratio Chi-Square 1 7.7672 0.0053
Continuity Adj. Chi-Square 1 6.9620 0.0083
Mantel-Haenszel Chi-Square 1 7.6360 0.0057
Phi Coefficient   0.1120  
Contingency Coefficient   0.1113  
Cramer's V   0.1120  
 
Fisher's Exact Test
Cell (1,1) Frequency (F) 280
Left-sided Pr <= F 0.9982
Right-sided Pr >= F 0.0040
   
Table Probability (P) 0.0022
Two-sided Pr <= P 0.0073

Sample Size = 610

 

Frequency
Percent
Col Pct
Table of RRD by Test
RRD(Q6: Recommend dietitian/nutritionist?) Test(Timing of survey response) Total
Pre-Test PostTest
No 300
49.18
98.68
288
47.21
94.12
588
96.39
 
Yes 4
0.66
1.32
18
2.95
5.88
22
3.61
 
Total 304
49.84
306
50.16
610
100.00

Statistics for Table of RRD by Test

 

Statistic DF Value Prob
Chi-Square 1 9.1475 0.0025
Likelihood Ratio Chi-Square 1 9.8747 0.0017
Continuity Adj. Chi-Square 1 7.8811 0.0050
Mantel-Haenszel Chi-Square 1 9.1325 0.0025
Phi Coefficient   0.1225  
Contingency Coefficient   0.1215  
Cramer's V   0.1225  
 
Fisher's Exact Test
Cell (1,1) Frequency (F) 300
Left-sided Pr <= F 0.9996
Right-sided Pr >= F 0.0019
   
Table Probability (P) 0.0016
Two-sided Pr <= P 0.0037

Sample Size = 610

 


 
Nutrition Education Initiative
Indiana State University, 1996-1997
Significant results: chapter 4, table 4
Maintenance visits: well-child, prenatal, physical

The FREQ Procedure

Frequency
Percent
Col Pct
Table of HOSNT by Test
HOSNT(Q4: Handouts on special nutrition topics) Test(Timing of survey response) Total
Pre-Test PostTest
No 125
48.83
96.90
115
44.92
90.55
240
93.75
 
Yes 4
1.56
3.10
12
4.69
9.45
16
6.25
 
Total 129
50.39
127
49.61
256
100.00
Frequency Missing = 1

Statistics for Table of HOSNT by Test

 

Statistic DF Value Prob
Chi-Square 1 4.4013 0.0359
Likelihood Ratio Chi-Square 1 4.5871 0.0322
Continuity Adj. Chi-Square 1 3.3846 0.0658
Mantel-Haenszel Chi-Square 1 4.3841 0.0363
Phi Coefficient   0.1311  
Contingency Coefficient   0.1300  
Cramer's V   0.1311  
 
Fisher's Exact Test
Cell (1,1) Frequency (F) 125
Left-sided Pr <= F 0.9920
Right-sided Pr >= F 0.0315
   
Table Probability (P) 0.0235
Two-sided Pr <= P 0.0410

Effective Sample Size = 256
Frequency Missing = 1

 

Frequency
Percent
Col Pct
Table of Recom by Test
Recom(Q6 IND: Any Nutrition Recommendations?) Test(Timing of survey response) Total
Pre-Test PostTest
No 117
45.53
90.70
98
38.13
76.56
215
83.66
 
Yes 12
4.67
9.30
30
11.67
23.44
42
16.34
 
Total 129
50.19
128
49.81
257
100.00

Statistics for Table of Recom by Test

 

Statistic DF Value Prob
Chi-Square 1 9.3896 0.0022
Likelihood Ratio Chi-Square 1 9.6471 0.0019
Continuity Adj. Chi-Square 1 8.3842 0.0038
Mantel-Haenszel Chi-Square 1 9.3531 0.0022
Phi Coefficient   0.1911  
Contingency Coefficient   0.1877  
Cramer's V   0.1911  
 
Fisher's Exact Test
Cell (1,1) Frequency (F) 117
Left-sided Pr <= F 0.9995
Right-sided Pr >= F 0.0017
   
Table Probability (P) 0.0012
Two-sided Pr <= P 0.0024

Sample Size = 257

 

Frequency
Percent
Col Pct
Table of RRD by Test
RRD(Q6: Recommend dietitian/nutritionist?) Test(Timing of survey response) Total
Pre-Test PostTest
No 128
49.81
99.22
115
44.75
89.84
243
94.55
 
Yes 1
0.39
0.78
13
5.06
10.16
14
5.45
 
Total 129
50.19
128
49.81
257
100.00

Statistics for Table of RRD by Test

 

Statistic DF Value Prob
Chi-Square 1 10.9775 0.0009
Likelihood Ratio Chi-Square 1 12.8951 0.0003
Continuity Adj. Chi-Square 1 9.2317 0.0024
Mantel-Haenszel Chi-Square 1 10.9347 0.0009
Phi Coefficient   0.2067  
Contingency Coefficient   0.2024  
Cramer's V   0.2067  
 
Fisher's Exact Test
Cell (1,1) Frequency (F) 128
Left-sided Pr <= F 1.0000
Right-sided Pr >= F 6.623E-04
   
Table Probability (P) 6.226E-04
Two-sided Pr <= P 7.067E-04

Sample Size = 257

 


 
Nutrition Education Initiative
Indiana State University, 1996-1997
Significant results: chapter 4, table 5

The FREQ Procedure

Frequency
Percent
Col Pct
Table of Question by Test
Question(Q7: Did you ask nutrition questions?) Test(Timing of survey response) Total
Pre-Test PostTest
No 264
43.28
86.84
243
39.84
79.41
507
83.11
 
Yes 40
6.56
13.16
63
10.33
20.59
103
16.89
 
Total 304
49.84
306
50.16
610
100.00

Statistics for Table of Question by Test

 

Statistic DF Value Prob
Chi-Square 1 5.9993 0.0143
Likelihood Ratio Chi-Square 1 6.0430 0.0140
Continuity Adj. Chi-Square 1 5.4815 0.0192
Mantel-Haenszel Chi-Square 1 5.9894 0.0144
Phi Coefficient   0.0992  
Contingency Coefficient   0.0987  
Cramer's V   0.0992  
 
Fisher's Exact Test
Cell (1,1) Frequency (F) 264
Left-sided Pr <= F 0.9949
Right-sided Pr >= F 0.0094
   
Table Probability (P) 0.0043
Two-sided Pr <= P 0.0172

Sample Size = 610



(Appendix F. Pre-Test vs. Post-Test: Additional Contingency Tables)

   Beyond Veg home   |   Feedback   |   Links